(This is an opinion piece. These are my educated opinions on any possible or probable outcome(s). As always, I do not support any illegal or unconstitutional activities.)
Let’s talk about Jeffrey Epstein. Even if it’s boring, and even if we should just say, “move along, please, nothing to see here…” reality is different. Already, hundreds of federal FBI agents are busy — not investigating crimes — but covering them up. Allegedly, of course. How can anyone verify facts when federal agents, working under Trump, are the ones doing the work to verify the information? How can I say this? Something called “common sense.”
Do you think all those items in the Epstein files, including the testimony and records, are being searched for every mention of “Trump” so they can then be released? Or maybe, just maybe, it’s to make them conveniently disappear. Why do you think Mike Johnson and his MAGA buddies in Congress tucked their tails between their legs and ran—they did it so that no vote to release the files could happen until September.
I am confident that by then, surprisingly, there will be no evidence of Trump being in any of the files, except for the most mundane and excusable coincidence.
Add his next possible (probable) move: a pardon or commutation in exchange for false or misleading testimony by Ghislaine Maxwell, claiming Trump never did anything inappropriate as the good, upstanding, Christian man he is. Ignore all past and current behavior—Trump is a saint! He certainly was not hanging out with teenage girls with his definitely-not-his-buddy Jeffrey Epstein.
They released all files on MLK, but they can’t do the same with Jeffrey Epstein?
Could it be because Trump and many other influential people are involved, and it could, at a minimum, cause them understandable and justified embarrassment? Could some of it also lead to criminal referrals (at least in a functioning democracy)?
Don’t worry, this is all factual and not libelous. Besides, it is purely conjecture and wonderment on my part; I am not accusing him or anyone else of any wrongdoing. How could I, when they are busily destroying every shred of evidence, and he has the entire US government helping him? I mean, theoretically, of course.
Besides, isn’t that similar to what MAGA likes saying, “I am just asking questions.”
Questions such as—what is your age limit?
(Please see the following link: https://www.cnn.com/2016/10/08/politics/trump-on-howard-stern )
Of course. Even MAGA is starting to realize they put a convicted criminal, traitor of the United States, fascist, and adjudicated rapist in charge.
But can we use the word rape? Well, according to the judge who ruled against Trump in the E. Jean Carroll case, from this article in the Guardian, yes:
“Judge says E Jean Carroll allegation Trump raped her is ‘substantially true’ in court dismissal” by Martin Pengelly on Mon 7 Aug 2023 16.33 EDT. Last modified on Sun 14 Apr 2024. Last modified on Sun 14 Apr 2024 08.24 EDT
So, is pedophilia a possibility for someone who admits to walking into changing rooms with underage girls because he can? Should it be a concern if that person is also an adjudicated rapist? When it comes to having sexual relationships with girls (they are called women when they turn 18, until then they are also called “children” or “kids” or “underage”), it certainly merits a full and unimpeded investigation, one would think. Last time I checked statutory rape was a crime and they are the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Well, that is it for my musings for today. I am certainly not implying, in any way, that someone in a position of power would ever misuse their Office to commit vile and illegal acts. Just as I am sure no federal agents under the current administration will do anything more than a complete and unbiased investigation into any criminal wrongdoing …
In parting, and unlike what I wish for Donald Trump and other MAGA criminals—
MAY YOU ALWAYS BE FREE !!
